Why are non-citizen rights becoming more important than the rights of US citizens and protection of all? I concede no argument for it. Jerry Brown and Antonio Villaraigosa aren’t working for you and here’s another example — When caught at a DUI Checkpoint, unlicensed drivers may soon be allowed to telephone another to pick up his/her vehicle instead of having it impounded. We, licensed drivers aren’t allowed that luxury. How is that logical or fair? Let’s get them driving again without a license (and possibly drunk) asap. It just doesn’t make sense. Please consider your votes Californians. Why these two clowns (and others similarly situated) over and over? And bravo to those who draw attention to bad political maneuvers like this.
Injustice
October 22, 2011
Where’s The Incentive For Legal Immigration?
Posted by usacopywriter under Bad Moves, Changes That Need To Happen, Injustice, Legal Issues, Political Issues, Uncategorized | Tags: bad political decisions, illegal immigrants, immigration, repeal, the dream act |Leave a Comment
Where is the incentive for legal immigration? Can anyone answer that? There’s plenty of incentive for illegal immigration. Does that seem right? It doesn’t. And it’s not.
January 6, 2010
Another Bad Political Decision By The Terminator.
Posted by usacopywriter under Bad Moves, Changes That Need To Happen, Injustice, Political Issues, Poopy Politicians, Uncategorized | Tags: bad political decisions, California government, closure of state parks, fun terminator, Governor Schwarzenegger, pointing out poor political practices, sale of the orange county fair grounds |1 Comment
As previously reported on Politics is Not a Sport, Arnold Schwarzenegger, California’s current Governor has been nothing but a disappointment. And now he wants to sell the Orange County Fair Grounds, which only places a band-aid on a continuously bleeding wound. It’s another disservice to California (especially Orange County) residents and more bad decisions being made by Politicians to simply plug the mess they’ve created. Arnold should be considered The Fun Terminator — What great ideas he’s had to close State Parks, sell the Fair Grounds and keep taking away from the people. It’s a terrible thing. Please write him an e-mail to express your frustration with this decision and many others. He’s supposed to be working for the people and needs to be reminded of that.
July 16, 2009
Please STOP Government Run Health Care.
Posted by usacopywriter under Bad Moves, Fraud on Americans, Government Healthcare, Injustice, Political Issues | Tags: bad political decisions, citizens againsted nationalized healthcare, free our health care, it doesn't make sense, it won't work, link to petition, patients united now, sly swift harmful decisions for America, stop governmental health care |[2] Comments
Why is Government Health Care being forced on Americans? Why now? Why so fast and without regard to addressing the reality of it? Too many bad Political decisions (that aren’t the will of the people) are being made. The massive, swift changes that harm America and Americans must stop. It’s not right, good, nor fair. Please start HERE http://www.freeourhealthcarenow.com/ regarding this issue.
MORE INFO (Updated 07/21/09): http://patientsunitednow.com/
January 14, 2009
Why Isn’t Bernard Madoff (and Matoff) In Jail?
Posted by usacopywriter under Bad Moves, Financial Scams, Fraud on Americans, Injustice, Legal Issues, Uncategorized | Tags: Benard Matoff needs to go to jail, Bernie Madoff update, bernie matoff news, breach of fiduciary duty, financial fraud, Financial Scams, house arrest, Madoff, unaccounted for fraud, why aren't more in jail |1 Comment
I’m tired of the fiduciary breaches. Bernard Madoff (Matoff) and many others need to be in jail for ripping off hardworking Americans. The financial fraud needs to be stopped NOW. Why do the taxpayers have to keep paying for it? It’s not right!
Related Links:
http://www.go2gbo.com/forums/index.php?topic=160266.0;wap2
UPDATE: He’s in jail now. Good, but I’m a little disturbed that his wife is living in wealth if she helped him hide money. I have absolutely no idea, but I hope it’s still being investigated. Money needs to be returned to the people.
January 7, 2009
Another Disservice To America By The ACLU.
Posted by usacopywriter under Bad Moves, Injustice, Legal Issues, Uncategorized | Tags: $240, 000, ACLU, airline passenger, asked to change tshirt because of Arabic script, Jet Blue, lawsuit |Leave a Comment
A man was awarded $240,000 because he felt bad that he had to change his shirt and seat. It’s utterly ridiculous and encourages more lawsuits. There were others who felt uncomfortable about the shirt, what about their collective rights? Once again, the ACLU is on the wrong side of America.
http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/item.aspx?type=blog&ak=60949274.blog&csp=34
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/ustransportairsecuritymuslimsrights
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5i9_XPfpm0_Xi0USqY-9P3ds2OhJg
October 23, 2008
This Article Says It All And We’re Sick Of It!
Posted by usacopywriter under Bad Moves, Injustice, Media Bias, Political Elections, Poopy Politicians, Uncategorized | Tags: Americans are sick of it, article in the paper, bad politicians, democratic bias, fire the biased media, greensboro, linear publishing, Media Bias, Orson Scott Card, poor reporting, public needs the truth, public wants to know the truth, rhinoceros times, shaddy politics, so-called reporters are ruining america, truth doesn't matter anymore in politics, where are the honest reporters |Leave a Comment
Would the Last Honest Reporter Please Turn On the Lights?
An open letter to the local daily paper — almost every local daily paper in America:
I remember reading All the President’s Men and thinking: That’s journalism. You do what it takes to get the truth and you lay it before the public, because the public has a right to know.
This housing crisis didn’t come out of nowhere. It was not a vague emanation of the evil Bush administration. It was a direct result of the political decision, back in the late 1990s, to loosen the rules of lending so that home loans would be more accessible to poor people. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were authorized to approve risky loans. What is a risky loan? It’s a loan that the recipient is likely not to be able to repay.
The goal of this rule change was to help the poor — which especially would help members of minority groups. But how does it help these people to give them a loan that they can’t repay? They get into a house, yes, but when they can’t make the payments, they lose the house — along with their credit rating. They end up worse off than before.
This was completely foreseeable and in fact many people did foresee it. One political party, in Congress and in the executive branch, tried repeatedly to tighten up the rules. The other party blocked every such attempt and tried to loosen them.
Furthermore, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were making political contributions to the very members of Congress who were allowing them to make irresponsible loans. (Though why quasi-federal agencies were allowed to do so baffles me. It’s as if the Pentagon were allowed to contribute to the political campaigns of congressmen who support increasing their budget.)
Isn’t there a story here? Doesn’t journalism require that you who produce our daily paper tell the truth about who brought us to a position where the only way to keep confidence in our economy was a $700 billion bailout? Aren’t you supposed to follow the money and see which politicians were benefiting personally from the deregulation of mortgage lending? I have no doubt that if these facts had pointed to the Republican Party or to John McCain as the guilty parties, you would be treating it as a vast scandal. “Housing-gate,” no doubt. Or “Fannie-gate.”
Instead, it was Sen. Christopher Dodd and Congressman Barney Frank, both Democrats, who denied that there were any problems, who refused Bush administration requests to set up a regulatory agency to watch over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and who were still pushing for these agencies to go even further in promoting subprime mortgage loans almost up to the minute they failed.
As Thomas Sowell points out in a TownHall.com essay entitled “Do Facts Matter?” (http://snipurl.com/457to): “Alan Greenspan warned them four years ago. So did the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers to the President. So did Bush’s Secretary of the Treasury.” These are facts. This financial crisis was completely preventable. The party that blocked any attempt to prevent it was … the Democratic Party. The party that tried to prevent it was … the Republican Party.
Yet when Nancy Pelosi accused the Bush administration and Republican deregulation of causing the crisis, you in the press did not hold her to account for her lie. Instead, you criticized Republicans who took offense at this lie and refused to vote for the bailout! What? It’s not the liar, but the victims of the lie who are to blame? Now let’s follow the money … right to the presidential candidate who is the number two recipient of campaign contributions from Fannie Mae.
And after Fred Raines, the CEO of Fannie Mae who made $90 million while running it into the ground, was fired for his incompetence, one presidential candidate’s campaign actually consulted him for advice on housing.
If that presidential candidate had been John McCain, you would have called it a major scandal and we would be getting stories in your paper every day about how incompetent and corrupt he was. But instead, that candidate was Barack Obama, and so you have buried this story, and when the McCain campaign dared to call Raines an “adviser” to the Obama campaign — because that campaign had sought his advice — you actually let Obama’s people get away with accusing McCain of lying, merely because Raines wasn’t listed as an official adviser to the Obama campaign.
You would never tolerate such weasely nit-picking from a Republican. If you who produce our local daily paper actually had any principles, you would be pounding this story, because the prosperity of all Americans was put at risk by the foolish, short-sighted, politically selfish and possibly corrupt actions of leading Democrats, including Obama. If you who produce our local daily paper had any personal honor, you would find it unbearable to let the American people believe that somehow Republicans were to blame for this crisis.
There are precedents. Even though President Bush and his administration never said that Iraq sponsored or was linked to 9/11, you could not stand the fact that Americans had that misapprehension — so you pounded us with the fact that there was no such link. (Along the way, you created the false impression that Bush had lied to them and said that there was a connection.)
If you had any principles, then surely right now, when the American people are set to blame President Bush and John McCain for a crisis they tried to prevent, and are actually shifting to approve of Barack Obama because of a crisis he helped cause, you would be laboring at least as hard to correct that false impression. Your job, as journalists, is to tell the truth. That’s what you claim you do, when you accept people’s money to buy or subscribe to your paper.
But right now, you are consenting to or actively promoting a big fat lie — that the housing crisis should somehow be blamed on Bush, McCain and the Republicans. You have trained the American people to blame everything bad — even bad weather — on Bush, and they are responding as you have taught them to. If you had any personal honor, each reporter and editor would be insisting on telling the truth — even if it hurts the election chances of your favorite candidate. Because that’s what honorable people do. Honest people tell the truth even when they don’t like the probable consequences. That’s what honesty means. That’s how trust is earned.
Barack Obama is just another politician, and not a very wise one. He has revealed his ignorance and naiveté time after time — and you have swept it under the rug, treated it as nothing. Meanwhile, you have participated in the borking of Sarah Palin, reporting savage attacks on her for the pregnancy of her unmarried daughter — while you ignored the story of John Edwards’ own adultery for many months. So I ask you now: Do you have any standards at all? Do you even know what honesty means? Is getting people to vote for Barack Obama so important that you will throw away everything that journalism is supposed to stand for?
You might want to remember the way the National Organization of Women (NOW) threw away their integrity by supporting Bill Clinton despite his well-known pattern of sexual exploitation of powerless women. Who listens to NOW anymore? We know they stand for nothing; they have no principles. That’s where you are right now. It’s not too late. You know that if the situation were reversed, and the truth would damage McCain and help Obama, you would be moving heaven and earth to get the true story out there.
If you want to redeem your honor, you will swallow hard and make a list of all the stories you would print if it were McCain who had been getting money from Fannie Mae, McCain whose campaign had consulted with its discredited former CEO, McCain who had voted against tightening its lending practices.
Then you will print them, even though every one of those true stories will point the finger of blame at the reckless Democratic Party, which put our nation’s prosperity at risk so they could feel good about helping the poor, and lay a fair share of the blame at Obama’s door.
You will also tell the truth about John McCain: that he tried, as a senator, to do what it took to prevent this crisis. You will tell the truth about President Bush: that his administration tried more than once to get Congress to regulate lending in a responsible way. This was a Congress-caused crisis, beginning during the Clinton administration, with Democrats leading the way into the crisis and blocking every effort to get out of it in a timely fashion.
If you at our local daily newspaper continue to let Americans believe — and vote as if — President Bush and the Republicans caused the crisis, then you are joining in that lie. If you do not tell the truth about the Democrats — including Barack Obama — and do so with the same energy you would use if the miscreants were Republicans — then you are not journalists by any standard.
You’re just the public relations machine of the Democratic Party, and it’s time you were all fired and real journalists brought in, so that we can actually have a daily newspaper in our city.
Source:
July 29, 2008
Ramos and Compean Injustice For All.
Posted by usacopywriter under Bad Moves, Injustice, Legal Issues, Uncategorized | Tags: 5th circuit court of appeals upholds decision, bad court decision, bad political decisions, border patrol agents, let law enforcement do their job, political injustice, political motivation, ramos and compean |[4] Comments
Yesterday’s 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Decision to uphold the Ramos and Compean convictions is just not right. Law Enforcement should not be punished for trying to do an honest job. They put their lives at risk and are required to make important split-second decisions on a daily basis. It’s a lot of responsibility without proportionate support. And since we’re only human here, we might not always do what’s best — But does it really make sense to send these two to prison for (10) years? The answer is definitely NO.
What’s the real story here? Who is being protected? It’s certainly not American citizens. We need to allow Law Enforcement to protect all those living here and simply enforce the laws. It appears that enforcing laws has become an arbitrary or politically motivated practice. They’re selectively being applied when there’s something to be gained by a certain party or lobbying group, not for the benefit of the American population as a whole.
Why are we seeing so many gray areas in Law Enforcement? The law is the law. Either something is illegal, or it’s not. We need to allow those who choose a Law Enforcement career to do their job, without the fear of unfair prosecution or political scrutiny — Otherwise, who is going to want the position? I certainly wouldn’t.
The decision to prosecute Ramos and Compean, the withholding of important information during trial, and the upholding of these bad decisions effect all our safety, but most specifically here – The Ramos and Compean families who are unjustly hurting tremendously. Why are we protecting the Mexican drug cartel? Come on now. We need to speak out or we’re just going to lose more — I’m happy that KFI cares.
http://www.kfiam640.com/main.html
If you wish to donate money to the families, please access the link below.
http://www.nbpc.net/?cat=10